There are more than 3 million Google hits in a search for “the power of compound interest“, and most of them talk about how beginning a savings plan early in your career can theoretically result in an rich retirement fund. The so-called secret of compound interest is that future interest payments are not based solely on the original principal, but also on *prior* interest. That is, unlike “simple” interest (which no one ever uses), compound interest means that the interest is added to the balance, and consequently from that point on, interest must be paid on a *higher* balance (i.e., interest is paid on the interest). The result is exponential growth of the balance.

However, remember that a lender’s retirement fund is a borrowers’ mortgage or credit card debt. Compounding works against borrowers, just as it works in favor of lenders. To this end, borrowers need to understand what is typically not explained in the retirement planning articles — the term *compounding period.* The convention in finance is to report interest rates on an annual basis, such as 8 percent per year, called the Annual Percentage Rate (or APR). For example, if all credit card companies report interest rates on an APR basis, then consumers can easily compare rates, and shop for the cheapest card. However, in practice interest can be added to the balance of a credit card loan daily, monthly, or whenever. The compounding period is the amount of time that elapses between the addition of new interest to the balance (which is called compounding).

The fact that interest rates are reported on an annual basis, but compounding takes place more frequently creates a difficult problem of communication in finance. By convention, the *nominal* interest rate is the stated rate *before* the effects of compounding. For example, a bank or an auto dealer might quote a low nominal lending rate, and if the rate were compounded annually, this would be exactly the rate paid by borrowers. But loan interest is almost *never* compounded annually! The *effective* rate is what the borrowers actually have to pay, and it is always greater than (or equal to) the nominal rate.

In this video from Khan Academy, Salman Khan demonstrates how more frequent compounding results in higher effective interest rates.

Because compounding is the act of adding interest to the balance of the loan, the more often the interest is compounded, the more interest borrowers will have to pay. To convert a nominal interest rate to an effective interest rate, we have to pay close attention to the units of *time.* The formula looks like this:

Reff = ( 1 + Rnom / n ) ^ n – 1

where Reff = the effective rate, Rnom = the nominal rate, and n = the number of compounding periods over the time period for which Rnom is reported (usually a year).

For example, if Rnom is stated as a percentage *per year* and we compound monthly, then n = 12. If Rnom is stated as a percentage per year and compound daily, then n = 365. But the same formula can work for unusual combinations. Let’s say that for some strange reason we report Rnom as a percentage *per week* and compound daily. Then n = 7.

The higher the interest rate, the more important the compounding period is. That is, the difference between daily and annual compounding is a lot bigger at 12%/yr interest than at 4%/yr. The more often we compound, the higher the effective rate goes.

Try some calculations yourself with your own calculator:

12%/yr compounded monthly = ( 1 + .12 / 12) ^ 12 – 1 = 0.126825 (or 12.683%)

12%/yr compounded daily = (1 + .12 / 365 ) ^ 365 – 1 = .12747 (or 12.747%)

12%/yr compounded hourly = ( 1 + .12 / (365*24) ) ^ (365 * 24) – 1 = .127496 (or 12.750%)

Notice how the difference between annual compounding (12.00%) and monthly compounding (12.68%) is large, but the difference between monthly and daily (12.747%) is smaller, and the difference between daily and hourly (12.750%) is almost nonexistent. The limit as the number of compounding periods approach infinity (or the compounding period goes to zero) is *finite*, and asymptotically approaches a simpler equation:

Reff = exp (Rnom) -1

In our example where Rnom = 12%/yr, Reff = exp (.12) = 12.7496%, almost exactly the same result as the hourly figure. This simpler formula is called *continuous compounding*, and it use the universal natural growth constant *e* (approximately equal to 2.718).

In this video, Salman Khan shows the same mathematics in his own example, resulting in what he calls the “magical number” *e*, which is the key to continuous compounding.

When you get past Salman’s fascination with *e*, you’ll see that his next video generalizes the example in the previous video into the same formula presented above in terms of Rnom and n, and *derives* the continuous compounding formula. I’m not embedding it here, because the derivation is not essential to understanding engineering finance, but I’ve linked it in case you’re curious.

To use continuous compounding to compute future values on balances borrowed (or lent), we need to understand where to insert *time* into the continuous compounding formula. Remember that both nominal and effective interest rates must be reported in units of $interest/$principal/time, usually a %/yr. **The only difference between nominal and effective interest rates is the compounding period. ** When using continuous compounding, the amount of a future balance is computed from the present value thus:

F = P * exp (rt)

where r = the nominal interest rate (%/time), and t is time (in the same units as the nominal interest rate, usually years).

Although both nominal and effective rates are expressed per unit time (such as %/yr or %/month), effective rates will always be higher than nominal rates when compounding takes place more frequently.

**Nominal** interest rates are the stated, advertised, or quoted rates. Where no time period is stated, than per year (also known as per annum) is assumed.

**Effective** interest rates are what borrows have to *actually pay*, and depend on how frequently the nominal rate is *compounded* (i.e., which means adding interest to the balance of the loan).

Here’s a practice problem that you can use to help you understand the difference:

The nominal interest rate on a credit card balance is advertised as 21%. However, interest is compounded *monthly*. What is the annual effective interest rate?

Tweet your answer #CEE300!

**Related articles**

- Understanding “interest” (sustainableengineeringsystems.com)
- 10 Things You Need to Know About Compound Interest (money.usnews.com)
- Interest Rates: The Darkest Black Swan Ahead? (seekingalpha.com)
- Inside Money: Compounding problems: an overdue financial lesson (nzherald.co.nz)

jonathanedgingtonI have no doubts that everyone who watches these videos will immediately find an interest in them and comprehend the compounded value of return on your time invested understanding the material being conveyed as financial information pertains to us all.

Esteban BarbozaI would just like to clarify that the first formula given in the text (after the first Khan video) is more clearly written as:

Reff = (1+(Rnom/n))^(n) – 1

I hope that clears up any confusion.